Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  6 / 172 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 6 / 172 Next Page
Page Background

Digestive and Liver Disease 48S2 (2016) e67–e231

e67

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Digestive and Liver Disease

j o u r n a l h ome p a g e : www. e l s ev i e r. c om / l o c a t e / d l d

VOLUME 48 SUPPLEMENT 1 FEBRUARY2016

ISSN 1590-8658

22ndNationalCongressofDigestiveDiseases

ItalianFederationofSocietiesof

DigestiveDiseases – FISMAD

Naples,24–27 February 2016

PC.01 Plenary Session

PC.01.1

MANAGEMENT OF BILIARY ANASTOMOTIC STRICTURE AFTER

LIVER TRANSPLANTATION (BASALT STUDY): RESULTS OF A

NATIONAL SURVEY IN ITALY

Cantù P.*

21

, Parzanese I.

21

, Balassone V.

1

, Di Sario A.

2

, Soggiu F.

3

,

Lombardi G.

4

, Barbaro F.

6

, Pisani A.

7

, Baldan A.

8

, Cariani G.

9

,

Boarino V.

10

, Fasoli A.

11

, Bertani H.

12

, Forti E.

13

, Bulajic M.

14

,

Ghinolfi D.

15

, Nadal E.

16

, Cerofolini A.

17

, Barresi L.

18

, Stroppa I.

1

,

Mazzaferro V.

3

, Cipolletta L.

4

, Tringali A.

6

, Costamagna G.

5

,

Ravelli P.

19

, Bazzoli F.

9

, Merighi A.

10

, Parodi M.C.

11

, Conigliaro R.

12

,

Mutignani M.

13

, Zilli M.

14

, Filipponi F.

15

, Fantin A.

16

, Rodella L.

17

,

Traina M.

18

, Rotondano G.

20

, Rosa R.

21

, Malinverno F.

22

, Donato F.

22

,

Colombo M.

22

, Conte D.

21

, Rossi G.

23

, Penagini R.

21

1

U.O.S.D. Endoscopia Digestiva Operativa e d’Urgenza, Fondazione

Policlinico Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy,

2

SOD Clinica di Gastroenterologia,

Epatologia ed Endoscopia Digestiva d’Urgenza, Azienda Ospedaliera

Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy,

3

S.C. Chirurgia

Generale ad indirizzo oncologico 1, Epato-gastro-pancreatico e

Trapianto di Fegato, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori,

Milano, Italy,

4

U.O.S.C. Gastroenterologia, Azienda Ospedaliera di

Rilievo Nazionale Antonio Cardarelli, Napoli, Italy,

5

Endoscopia

Digestiva Chirurgica, Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli,

Roma, Italy,

6

U.O.C. Endoscopia Digestiva Chirurgica, Policlinico

Universitario Agostino Gemelli, Roma, Italy,

7

U.O.C. Gastroenterologia

Universitaria, Azienda Ospedaliera Policlinico di Bari, Bari, Italy,

8

U.O.C. Gastroenterologia 1 - Epatologia e Trapiantologia, AO

Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy,

9

U.O.C. Gastroenterologia ed

Endoscopia Digestiva, Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy,

10

U.O.C. Gastroenterologia, Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy,

11

U.O.C. Gastroenterologia ed Endoscopia Digestiva, Ospedale San

Martino, Genova, Italy,

12

U.O. Endoscopia Digestiva, Nuovo Ospedale

Sant’Agostino Estense, Baggiovara, Italy,

13

U.O.C. Endoscopia

digestiva e Interventistica, Ospedale Niguarda Ca’ Granda, Milano,

Italy,

14

U.O.C. Gastroenterologia, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria

Santa Maria della Misericordia, Udine, Italy,

15

U.O.C. Chirurgia

Epatica e dei Trapianti di Fegato, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria

Pisana, Pisa, Italy,

16

U.O.C. Gastroenterologia, Azienda Ospedaliera

di Padova, Padova, Italy,

17

U.O.C. Endoscopia Chirurgica d’Urgenza,

Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata di Verona, Ospedale di

Borgo Trento, Verona, Italy,

18

U.O.C. Gastroenterologia e Endoscopia

Digestiva, Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta

Specializzazione ISMETT, Palermo, Italy,

19

U.O.C. Gastroenterologia

2 - Endoscopia Digestiva, Azienda Ospedaliera Papa Giovanni XXIII,

Bergamo, Italy,

20

U.O.C. Gastroenterologia ed Endoscopia Digestiva,

Ospedale Maresca, Torre del Greco, Italy,

21

U.O.C. Gastroenterologia ed

Endoscopia, Dipartimento di Fisiopatologia e dei Trapianti, Fondazione

IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Università degli

Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy,

22

U.O.C. Gastroenterologia e Epatologia,

Dipartimento di Fisiopatologia e dei Trapianti, Fondazione IRCCS

Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Università degl Studi di

Milano, Milano, Italy,

23

U.O.C. Chirurgia Epato-bilio-pancreatica,

Dipartimento di Fisiopatologia e dei Trapianti, Fondazione IRCCS

Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Università degli Studi di

Milano, Milano, Italy

Background and aim:

An International Consensus on management

of biliary anastomotic stricture (AS) after liver transplantation (LT)

still lacks. Aim was to retrospectively report the overall workload

and to give a picture of the management of AS after LT in Italy.

Material and methods:

A questionnaire was sent to the Endoscopy

Units working with the 21 Italian Liver Transplantation Centers.

The questionnaire was composed of 5 topics including: 1. annual

workload (year 2013), 2. selection criteria (clinical, biochemical,

radiological) for endotherapy, 3. criteria to confirm the presence of

AS, 4. type of endotherapy, 5. treatment of recurrent AS.

Results:

Eighteen of the 21 Units returned the questionnaire.

1. Twelve out seventeen are high volume (> 250 ERCPs/year) Units.

During 2013, 170 of 705 (23%) liver transplanted pts underwent

endotherapy for AS. 319 (5.4%) out of a total of 5886 ERCPs (median/

Centre 13, range 5-60) were performed. Interventional radiology

or surgery was used in 3.5% and 2.4% of patients after unsuccessful

ERCP. In 5.6% of cases interventional radiology was preferred as first-

line treatment. In seven out of seventeen Units biliary complications

after hepatico-jejunal anastomosis were approached by enteroscopy.

2. In 83% of the Units selection criteria for ERCP included alteration

of liver tests associated with AS documented at non-invasive

imagings; biliary obstructive symptoms were additionally required

in the others. Trend of liver tests was considered in 83%; Magnetic

Resonance (MR) or T-tube cholangiography was used in 89%.

3. There was no consensus on operative criteria to confirm AS during

ERCP.

4. AS was treated by fully covered metal stent (SEMS) or plastic

multistenting (PM) in 6 Centers, PM only in 9 and single plastic

stenting in one. Use of fully covered SEMS was independent of

the overall ERCP workload of the Units. Fully covered SEMS were

used only transpapillary, being removed after three (25%) or six

Abstracts

22nd National Congress of Digestive Diseases,

Italian Federation of Societies of Digestive Diseases – FISMAD

Naples, 24–27 February 2016

Plenary sessions

1590-8658/© 2016 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.