Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  158 / 172 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 158 / 172 Next Page
Page Background

Abstracts of the 22

nd

National Congress of Digestive Diseases / Digestive and Liver Disease 48S2 (2016) e67–e231

e219

Every patient was diagnosed and/or followed up with laboratory

tests (full blood count, liver-, thyroid- and kidney function, tumor

markers), genetic test, abdominal, thyroid, pelvis, testicular

ultrasonography, dermatologic, eye and otolaryngologic exam,

panoramic radiography.

Besides the endoscopic follow up, the protocol for extraintestinal

manifestations varied based on clinical and family history.

Ultrasonography of thyroid, abdomen, pelvis, testes anddermatologic

exam were repeated annually.

Results:

The cohort included 63 patients (32M, 8-80 years, median

age 32.8 years).

Fifty-nine had classic FAP, 1 Gardner Syndrome, 1 AFAP, 2 MAP.

The follow up protocol allowed to detect malignant lesions: among

classic FAPs, 1 manifested hepatoblastoma (1,7%), 3 surrenal

adenomas (5%), 3 osteomas (5%) and 4 disodontiasis (6,7%), 2 nasal

polyposis (3.4%), 7 retinal pigmented lesions (11.8%), 3 desmoids

(5%), 3 papillary thyroid carcinomas (5%), 1 testicular carcinoma

(1,7%), 1 ovarian adenocarcinoma (1,7).

The patient affected by Gardner Syndrome manifested 1

retroperitoneal neurofibroma, 1 surrenal adenoma anddisodontiasis;

among MAP and AFAP patients, none manifested malignancies.

All the lesions were detected at early stage and followed up or treated

with good prognosis, complete resolution and without relapse.

Conclusions:

FAP is a complex syndrome with multiorgan

involvement. The diagnostic and follow up protocol detected typical

and non typical associated malignancies at early stage. Further

research is requested to optimize dedicated diagnostic-therapeutic

protocols, which have to be performed in specialized tertiary care

centers.

P.18.9

ENDOSCOPIC PIECEMEAL RESECTION OF SESSILE OR FLAT

COLONIC LESIONS > 2 CM: LONG-TERM RESULTS

Bucciero F.*, Talamucci L., Naspetti R., Manetti R.

AOU Careggi, Firenze, Italy

Background and aim:

Evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic piecemeal

resection of sessile or flat colonic lesions > 2 cm.

Material and methods:

We selected all the sessile or flat colonic

lesion > 2 cm underwent endoscopic piecemeal resection.

Results:

We selected 109 sessile or flat lesions > 2 cm of 104 patients

(41 women and 63 men).

The average size of polyps was 37 mm (range 21-80 mm). 18 were

located in ceco, 16 in the ascending colon, 6 at the right colic flexure,

5 in the transverse, 2 in the left colic flexure, 3 in the descending

colon, 17 in sigmoid and 42 in the rectum.

Histological examination showed 94 adenomas tubule-villous, 2

tubular adenomas, 2 villous adenoma. High-grade dysplasia was

in 48 lesions; 9 lesions had areas of intramucosal cancer with clear

surgical margins and 2 had areas of cancer infiltrating the submucosa

and engaging margins. These last two patients underwent surgery.

Additional treatment with APC was performed in 96 of 109 lesions.

We observed a statistically significant correlation between the

presence of invasive carcinoma and the seat rectal and size > 5 cm.

Complications occurred in 13 cases: 8 bleeding treated

endoscopically, 4 perforations treated with medical therapy and 1

post-polypectomy syndrome. We observed a statistically significant

correlation between the onset of complications and the size> 5 cm

lesion.

In six cases we observed endoscopic recurrence at 3 months after

resection. After endoscopic treatment of relapse in this case no

further relapses occurred.

We observed a statistically significant correlation between the loss

of use of the APC and the onset of relapse and between the size> 4

cm and the onset of relapse.

Conclusions:

Endoscopic piecemeal resection can be considered a

valid alternative as ESD because it is a safe and simple technique,

with a low complication rate, low cost and requesting a lower

execution time.

P.18.10

SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF UNDILUITED N-BUTYL-2

CYANOACRYLATE INJECTION AS ENDOSCOPIC RESCUE

THERAPY FOR REFRACTORY ACUTE NONVARICEAL UPPER

GASTROINTESTINAL BLEEDING

Antonini F.*

1

, Rossetti P.

1

, Manta R.

2

, Piergallini S.

1

, Sica M.

2

,

Belfiori V.

1

, De Minicis S.

1

, Lo Cascio M.

1

, Marraccini B.

1

,

Andrenacci E.

1

, Mutignani M.

2

, Macarri G.

1

1

Ospedale A.Murri, Fermo, Italy,

2

Ospedale Niguarda-Ca’granda,

Milano, Italy

Background and aim:

Nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding

(NVUGIB) remains one of commonest medical emergencies

associated with a relevant proportion of refractory hemorrhage.

Novel technique, such as hemostatic powder, over-the-scope clip

and endoscopic suturing, have been recently used to treat refractory

NVUGIB. Cyanoacrylate glue (CYA) injection is an “old” technique

that has been shown to be very effective for control of variceal

bleeding, but its role in NVUGIB remains unclear. For CYA, the most

significant concern is the risk of distal embolization. Glubran 2®

(GEM; Viareggio, Italy) is a preparation of N-butyl-2 cyanoacrylate

plus methacryloxysulfolane (NBCM) with a longer polymerization

time than pure CYA and does not usually require dilution with

lipiodol. This could led to a minor rate of adverse events. Aim of this

study is to report author’s experience about the safety and efficacy of

NBCM injection for emergency control of refractory acute NVUGIB.

Material and methods:

A retrospective chart review was performed

on patients who underwent NBCM injection for severe recurrent

NVUGIB when conventional endoscopic techniques have failed. Main

outcome data for the procedure included achievement of initial

hemostasis, rate of early rebleeding (within 7 days), procedure-

related complications, and mortality.

Results:

From January 2010 to May 2015, 29 patients (19 men; mean

age 84, range 28-96) with refractory acute NVUGIB were treated

with NBCM. At the time of NBCM injection the patients were treated

previously with hemoclip placement (72.4%), local epinephrine

injection (68.9%), and argon plasma coagulation (3.4%). A bleeding

lesion was identified in the esophagus in one (3.4%) patient, stomach

in 14 (48.2%) patients, and duodenum in 14 (48.2%) patients.

Hemorrhage was secondary to 23 peptic ulcers (79.3%), 2 Dieulafoy

lesions (6.8%), 1 GIST (3.4%), 1 polypectomy (3.4%), 1 submucosal

dissection (3.4%) and 1 PEG placement (3.4%). Immediate hemostasis

was achieved in 27 patients (93.1%). Early rebleeding occurred in

two patients (6.8%); one of these was successfully treated with a

second NBCM injection. A total of 3 patients (10.3%) underwent

salvage treatment (surgery). No procedure-related adverse events

and no mortality were observed during the follow-up in any of the

patients. No instrument damage were reported.

Conclusions:

NBCMinjectionappears tobe a safe, effective, economic

and easily performed endoscopic rescue therapy for refractory acute

NVUGIB. NBCM may offer endoscopists an alternative therapeutic

strategy for severe bleeding when conventional endoscopic

techniques have failed.