Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  71 / 172 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 71 / 172 Next Page
Page Background

e132

Abstracts of the 22

nd

National Congress of Digestive Diseases / Digestive and Liver Disease 48S2 (2016) e67–e231

Background and aim:

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is considered

reversible regarding mental status (alertness, orientation) but may

not be from a cognitive standpoint (performance on specialized

tests that reflect daily function). Poor cognitive function despite

treatment for HE has been shown in single-center studies. The aim

of this study was to evaluate persistence of cognitive impairment in

patients treated for HE compared to those who never experienced

HE (no-HE) patients in a multi-center study.

Material and methods:

174 outpatient cirrhotics from 3 centers

(94 subjects from Virginia, 30 from Ohio and 50 from Rome, Italy)

underwentcognitivetestusingPsychometrichepaticencephalopathy

score (PHES) and Inhibitory control test (ICT); patients were tested

at baseline and re-tested at least 7 days apart without intervening

change in liver disease severity. ICT learning (change in 2nd half

lures compared to 1st half) was compared between HE and no-HE

patients at baseline and at the re-testing visits.

The changes in the PHES individual sub-tests between baseline and

re-testing visits were compared between HE and no-HE patients.

Results:

Thirty six patients had prior HE; all were controlled on

lactulose and 9 were on additional rifaximin. All HE patients were

completely alert and oriented at the time of the testing (mini-

mental score >25). HE patients had a higher MELD score compared

to no-HE patients (16 vs. 10, p<0.0001). HE patients had worse

performance on all tests compared to no-HE patients at baseline;

a significant improvement (learning) (1st half 7.1 vs. 6.2, 2nd half,

p<0.0001) was observed in no-HE patients and not in HE patients

(1st half 7.9 vs. 7.8, p=0.1). All patients were retested a median of

20 days later without change in cirrhosis severity, medications or

complications. No HE patients had significant learning or reduction

in lures (1st half 6.0 vs. 2nd half 5.4, p<0.0001), while in HE patients

again did not show ICT learning (1st half 7.8 vs. 2nd half 6.9, p=0.37).

As regards Psychometric Hepatic Encephalopathy Score (PHES), no-

HE patients shown an improvement in 4 PHES sub-tests instead of

HE patients had an improvement only in 2 PHES sub-tests.

Conclusions:

In this multi-center study, patients with prior HE

showed persistent significant learning impairment compared to

those without prior HE, despite adequate medical therapy. This

persistent change should increase efforts to reduce the first HE

episode.

P.01.7

MICROWAVE ABLATION OF LARGE HCCS BY SIMULTANEOUS

MULTIPLE ANTENNAE INSERTION: LONG TERM FOLLOW-UP

Tarantino L.*

1

, Ambrosino P.

2

1

Interventional Hepatology Unit - “A.Tortora” Oncology Hospital,

Pagani (SA), Italy,

2

Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery,

Federico II University, Napoli, Italy

Background and aim:

To report long term results of microwawe

(MW) ablation with simultaneous insertion of multiple antennae

for large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Material and methods:

Between October 2008 and September

2013, 36 cirrhotics with a single HCC nodule >3 cm (range :3.2-

7.0cm; mean: 4.4 cm) underwent MW ablation in a single session

by simultaneous insertion of multiple 13-gauge-MW-antennae

(Viva-Wave, Covidien, USA). All patients underwent intraoperative

evaluation of efficacy with contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS).

Residual viable tumor at CEUS was treated in the same session by

reinsertion of 2-3 MW antennae in the tumor. Efficacy of ablation

was definitely assessed with three-phase computed tomography

(CT) after one month. After treatment, scheduled follow-up entailed

US every 3 months and CT every 12 months.

Results:

10 and 18 patients were treated with a single insertion

of 2 and 3 synchronous antennae, respectively. 8 patients were

treated with 2 insertions of 3 antennae in the same session.

Intraoperative CEUS showed residual tumor in 12 patients. 9

out of these patients underwent an additional insertion of two

antennae and 3 patients of three antennae. Intraoperative CEUS at

the end of the procedure showed complete necrosis in all patients.

1month-CT showed complete necrosis in 33/36 patients. A severe

hemoperitoneum, treated with blood transfusion, occurred in one

patient after treatment. No major complication occurred in the

other patients. Follow-up ranged from 18 to 78 months (mean: 42

months). During follow-up, local recurrence occurred in 7 patients

within 3 to 12 months (mean: 6 months). Recurrences in other liver

segments occurred in 35/36 patients within 6 to 24 months (mean:

15 months). Extrahepatic metastasis from HCC were observed in

1 patient 24 months after treatment. 16 patients died within 18-

60 months (mean: 36 months), for tumor progression in 11 cases,

decompensation of cirrhosis in 4 cases, hemorrhagic stroke in 1

case, respectively. 20 patients were alive at 18-78 months follow-up

(mean: 42 months).

Conclusions:

Ablation of large HCC by simultaneous insertion of

multiple MW antennae is a safe and effective treatment and can

result in long survival of patients.