Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  107 / 172 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 107 / 172 Next Page
Page Background

e168

Abstracts of the 22

nd

National Congress of Digestive Diseases / Digestive and Liver Disease 48S2 (2016) e67–e231

was performed during therapy whereas ENT examination and nasal

cytology were performed at the end of treatment.

Results:

Of the 20 patients with NARNE, 14 (70%) resulted to have

pathological basal pH-Impedance values and 6 (30%) resulted to

have normal basal values. PH-impedance performed during PPI

treatment showed the normalization of the number of refluxes

(< 48) and pH values (< 4.2) in nine (64.3%) out of the 14 patients

with positive pH-Impedance at enrollment. Ph-Impedance during

treatment continued to be pathological in 3 (21.4%) patients with

a pathological number of refluxes (2 with acid pH, 1 with normal

pH values). Two (14,3%) subjects experienced improvement in

symptoms and showed the normalization of nasal cytology but

refused to repeat the pH-Impedance during therapy. Seven (77.8%)

out of 9 patients with normal ph-Impedance values under treatment

showed the simultaneous normalization of nasal cytology whereas

two (22,2%) subjects did not show any significant improvement at

nasal cytology.

Conclusions:

Our study showed a possible causal effect association

between GERD and NARNE. Treatment with high dose of oral PPI

for 8 weeks seemed to be effective in improving symptoms and in

reducing nasal inflammation in a significant number of patients

with NARNE. Larger studies are needed to confirm our data.

P.08.9

CORRELATION BETWEEN HIGH RESOLUTION MANOMETRY

PARAMETERS AND SYMPTOMS IN TREATED ACHALASIA PATIENTS

Pesce M.*, Esposito D., Maione F., Gennarelli N., Cargiolli M.,

De Palma G.D., Cuomo R., Sarnelli G.

Federico II University, Naples, Italy

Background and aim:

HRM is the gold standard study to follow up

achalasia patients after treatment However, discrepancies between

residual achalasia-related symptoms and HRM parameters may

occur, thus drifting therapeutic choices in subsets of achalasia

patients. Being more physiologic, it has been claimed that a HRM in

the upright position may better reflect the clinical condition of these

patients. We aimed to examine the effects of body position on HRM

parameters and whether they are related to symptoms’ persistence.

Material andmethods:

40 achalasia patients (20M, mean age 41 ± 12

ys) were treated with pneumatic dilation according to standardized

protocol. In all patients a standardized questionnaire assessing

the frequency and the intensity of achalasia-related symptoms

(dysphagia for solids and liquids graded from 0: absent to 9: at each

meal and precluding daily activities) was administered before and 6

months after pneumatic dilation. A HRM study was performed at the

same time points, both in supine and sitting position with at least 10

single 5-mL swallows performed for each series.

Results:

In all patients, a significant improvement of dysphagia

severity for both solids and liquids was achieved after dilation

(1±1.5 vs 6.7±2.2 and 0.6±1.1 vs 5.2±3.2 respectively; all p<0,001).

A significant reduction in terms of LES pressure, IRP4 and bolus

clearance rate was observed in the sitting as compared to the

supine position (32±13 vs 25,4±17 mmHg; 19,8±9,5 vs 14,8±10

and 67,5±36 vs 47,8±43%; respectively, all p<0.05). However, none

of the examined values showed a significant correlation with the

persistence of dysphagia for solids or liquids both in the upright and

supine position.

Conclusions:

Here we showed that, despite body position

significantly affects HRM parameters, none of these appears to

significantly correlate with symptoms’ persistence in treated

achalasia patients. HRM study, per se, may not predict the clinical

outcome of these patients and a number of variables (namely

achalasia subtypes, age, sex, presence of megaesophagus) may

account for residual symptoms in treated achalasia patients.

P.08.10

ESOPHAGOGASTRIC JUNCTION MORPHOLOGY ASSESSMENT BY

HIGH RESOLUTION MANOMETRY IN OBESE PATIENTS CANDIDATE

TO BARIATRIC SURGERY

Tolone S.*

1

, Savarino E.

2

, De Bortoli N.

3

, Frazzoni M.

4

, Furnari M.

5

,

Bosco A.

1

, Pirozzi R.

1

, Parisi S.

1

, Bondanese M.

1

, Jannelli G.

1

, Carlea N.

1

,

Ferrara F.

1

, Savarino V.

5

, Docimo L.

1

1

Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery, Second University of

Naples, Naples, Italy,

2

Division of Gastroenterology, Department

of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua,

Padua, Italy,

3

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal

Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy,

4

Digestive Pathophysiology

Unit and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Baggiovara Hospital, Modena,

Italy,

5

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine,

University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy

Background and aim:

Obesity is a strong independent risk factor

of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms and hiatal

hernia development. Pure restrictive bariatric surgery should not be

indicated in case of hiatal hernia and GERD. However it is unclear

what is the real incidence of disruption of esophagogastric junction

(EGJ) in patients candidate to bariatric surgery. Actually, high

resolution manometry (HRM) can provide accurate information

about EGJ morphology. Aim of this study was to describe the EGJ

morphology determined by HRM in obese patients candidate to

bariatric surgery and to verify if different EGJ morphologies are

associated to GERD-related symptoms presence.

Material and methods:

All patients underwent a standardized

questionnaire for symptom presence and severity, upper endoscopy,

high resolution manometry (HRM). EGJ was classified as: Type I, no

separation between the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and crural

diaphragm (CD); Type II, minimal separation (>1 and <2 cm); Type

III, >2 cm separation.

Results:

One hundred thirty-eight obese (BMI>35) subjects were

studied. Ninety-eight obese patients referred at least one GERD-

related symptom, whereas 40 subjects were symptom-free.

According to HRM features, EGJ Type I morphology was documented

in 51 (36.9%) patients, Type II in 48 (34.8%) and Type III in 39 (28.3%).

EGJ Type III subjects were more frequently associated to Symptoms

than EGJ Type I (38/39, 97.4%, vs. 21/59, 41.1% p<0.001).

Conclusions:

Obese subjects candidate to bariatric surgery have

a high risk of disruption of EGJ morphology. In particular, obese

patients with hiatal hernia often refer pre-operative presence

of GERD symptoms. Testing obese patients with HRM before

undergoing bariatric surgery, especially for restrictive procedures,

can be useful for assessing presence of hiatal hernia.

P.08.11

THE POSITION WITHIN THE OESOPHAGEAL CIRCUMFERENCE

PREDICTS DYSPLASIA IN SHORT SEGMENT BARRETT’S

ESOPHAGUS: A 7-YEAR RETROSPECTIVE SERIES OF 341 LESIONS

Bibbò S.

1

, Ianiro G.*

1

, Arciuolo D.

3

, Ricci R.

3

, Petruzziello L.

2

,

Spada C.

2

, Riccioni M.E.

2

, Larghi A.

2

, Dibitetto F.

1

, Monelli E.

1

,

Gasbarrini A.

1

, Costamagna G.

2

, Cammarota G.

1

1

Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology and Liver Unit - Catholic

University of Rome, Rome, Italy,

2

Endoscopy Unit - Catholic University

of Rome, Rome, Italy,

3

Histopathology Unit - Catholic University of

Rome, Rome, Italy

Background and aim:

A careful endoscopic surveillance of Barrett’s

esophagus (BE) is essential to prevent esophageal cancer. The aim

of this study is to identify the preferred location of short BE and its

associated dysplasia within the esophageal circumference.

Material and methods:

We retrospectively reviewed a prospectively

maintained database of patients with non-circumferential, short-