Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  110 / 172 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 110 / 172 Next Page
Page Background

Abstracts of the 22

nd

National Congress of Digestive Diseases / Digestive and Liver Disease 48S2 (2016) e67–e231

e171

P.08.16

NEW IMPEDANCE-PH PARAMETERS OF GASTRO-ESOPHAGEAL

REFLUX DISEASE: A LESSON FROM PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC

AUTOIMMUNE ATROPHIC GASTRITIS, NON-EROSIVE REFLUX

DISEASE AND FUNCTIONAL HEARTBURN

Andrea T.*

1

, Debortoli N.

2

, Mauro A.

1

, Frazzoni M.

3

, Savarino E.

4

,

Massironi S.

1

, Marchi S.

2

, Penagini R.

1

1

1Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit - Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda

Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico and Department of Pathophysiology and

Transplantation - Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy, Milano,

Italy,

2

2Department of Translational Research and New Technologies

in Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy, Pisa, Italy,

3

3Digestive

Pathophysiology Unit and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Baggiovara

Hospital, Modena, Italy, Modena, Italy,

4

4Department of Surgery,

Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy,

Padua, Italy

Background and aim:

Factors influencing new markers of gastro-

esophageal reflux disease (GERD) detected by multichannel

impedance monitoring (MII-pH) (i.e., mean nocturnal baseline

impedance, MNBI and Post-reflux Swallow-induced Peristaltic

Wave, PSPW index (1)) are still to be definitively elucidated.

To evaluate this issue, we included three different groups of

patients with a peculiar MII-pH pattern: 1) patients with chronic

autoimmune atrophic gastritis (CAAG) and MII-pH evidence of

GERD (2) 2) patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) and 3)

patients with functional heartburn (FH).

Material and methods:

Study design: Multi-center retrospective

analysis. Patients: 24 CAAG, 25 NERD and 25 FH patients. MII-pH

off PPI: All the tracings were retrospectively reviewed. GERD was

defined in presence of: i) increased acid exposure time (AET) and/or

ii) increased n° of total refluxes and/or iii) positive symptom index

(S.I.) and/or Symptom Association Probability (S.A.P.). Acid and non-

acid (i.e., weakly acid + weakly alkaline) as well as proximal refluxes

were reported. Normal values were based on (3), MNBI and PSPW

index were calculated according to (1). Statistical analysis: mean

and standard deviation was calculated. ANOVA was performed to

evaluate difference among groups (p significant when < 0.05).

Results:

Ninteen/24 CAAG patients (79%) were symptomatic; all

NERD and FH patients had heartburn. All data are summarized in

Table 1. Females were more prevalent in CAAG and FH groups

(p<0.0001), whereas age and body max index (BMI) was similar

among the three groups. As expected, total AET was significantly

higher in NERD patients (p<0.0001). Furthermore, CAAG and NERD

patients had a higher number of refluxes compared to FH, being acid

ones more common among NERD patients and non-acid among

CAAG patients. Intriguingly, PSPW index was similar between CAAG

and NERD patients but significantly lower compared to FH group

(p<0.0001), whereas MNBI decreased progressively in FH (>3000

Ohm), CAAG (> 2000 Ohm) and NERD (< 1000 Ohm) patients

(p=0.0046).

Conclusions:

Our results showed that both PSPW index and MNBI

improve diagnostic accuracy of MII-pH in GERD. PSPW index is a

strong marker of GERD and is not affected by AET.

References

1. Frazzoni M, Savarino E, de Bortoli N, et al. Analyses of the Post-reflux Swallow-

induced Peristaltic Wave Index and Nocturnal Baseline Impedance Parameters

Increase the Diagnostic Yield of Patients With Reflux Disease. Clin Gastroenterol

Hepatol 2015.

2. Tenca A, Massironi S, Pugliese D, et al. Gastro-esophageal reflux and antisecretory

drugs use among patients with chronic autoimmune atrophic gastritis: a study

with ph-impedance monitoring. Neurogastroenterology and Motility [IN PRESS].

3. Zentilin P, Iiritano E, Dulbecco P, et al. Normal values of 24-h ambulatory intra-

luminal impedance combined with pH-metry in subjects eating a Mediterranean

diet. Dig Liver Dis 2006;38:226-32.

P.09 Colon 1

P.09.1

HIGHER ADENOMA DETECTION RATE BUT NOT ADVANCED

ADENOMA WITH ENDOCUFF-ASSISTED COLONOSCOPY IN A

SCREENING POPULATION

Cavallaro L.*, Lecis P., Galliani E., Dal Pont E., Giacomin A.,

Iuzzolino P., Macri E., Roldo C., Soppelsa F., Di Camillo S., Mel R.,

Bastianello G.

ULSS1 Ospedale Belluno, Belluno, Italy

Background and aim:

The Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR) is one

of the quality measures in screening colonoscopy. The lower the

ADR the higher the risk of cancers after colonoscopy. Endocuff is an

endoscopic cap with plastic projections which permits to flatten the

colonic fold duringwithdrawal. Endocuff-Assisted colonoscopy (EAC)

is potentially able to ameliorate the ADR which is crucial especially

in a screening population. To compare in a screening population:

ADR, advanced adenoma detection rate (AADR) and number of

adenoma detected between EAC and Standard colonoscopy (SC).

Material and methods:

We compared the performance of SC (from

January to September 2014) and EAC (from January to September

2015) both in consecutive Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) positive

and endoscopical Follo-up screening participants. Colonoscopy

was performed by the same team of endoscopists in both 2014 and

2015. ADR was defined as the number of colonoscopy with at least

one adenoma divided by the total number of colonoscopies; mean

number of adenoma per patient was defined as the total number of

detected adenomas divided by the number of colonoscopies; AADR

as the number of colonoscopy with at least one advanced adenoma

(defined as an adenoma of 1cm or grater, or with villous/tubule-

villous components or with high grade dysplasia) divided by the

number of colonoscopies.

Results:

403 (198 F, mean age: 60.4 years, 49-70) and 445 (186 F,

60.2, 49-70) subjects performed SC and EAC respectively. ADR was

46% in SC and 53% in EAC, p<0.05. Mean number of adenoma per

patient who undertook SC and EAC was 0.9 (range: 0-8) and 1.1

(range: 0-13) respectively, p<0.05. Advanced adenoma detection

rate was 27% and 23% in SC and EAC respectively, p=ns.

Conclusions:

EAC increases both adenoma detection rate and

the number of polyps detected. However, it does not ameliorate

advanced adenoma detection rate.