Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  16 / 172 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 16 / 172 Next Page
Page Background

Abstracts of the 22

nd

National Congress of Digestive Diseases / Digestive and Liver Disease 48S2 (2016) e67–e231

e77

of markers of platelets activation correlate with the incidence of

CAD in IBD. Our results may also provide the rationale for targeting

platelet activation to improve both IBD activity and cardiovascular

risk.

OC.02.5

EXPERIMENTAL COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO MARKERS OF

INTESTINAL INFLAMMATION, HMGB1 AND FECAL CALPROTECTIN,

IN INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES

Barberio B.*

1

, D’Inca’ R.

1

, Stronati L.

2

, Vitali R.

2

, Palone F.

2

,

Cucchiara S.

3

, Sturniolo G.C.

1

1

Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova, Padova, Italy,

2

Dipartimento di

Radiobiologia e Salute dell’Uomo, ENEA, Roma, Italy,

3

Dipartimento

di Gastroenterologia ed Epatologia Pediatrica, Azienda Policlinico

Umberto I, Roma, Italy

Background and aim:

In inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD),

the fecal marker currently mostly used is calprotectin. Recently,

HMGB1 has been proposed as a new surrogate marker of intestinal

inflammation. This is a non-histone chromatin protein with an

architectural function, which, after proinflammatory stimuli

(TNFalpha, IL-1, IFN-gamma), is secreted by immune cells. We

evaluated the correlation between fecal levels of HMGB1 and

disease severity (as assessed by endoscopic indexes), and compared

the results with those obtained with the measurement of fecal

calprotectin. Moreover, we assessed the specificity of this marker

for IBD by analyzing samples of non-IBD patients.

Material and methods:

We recruited three groups of patients:

IBD patients (of which 20 with Crohn’s Disease and 25 with

Ulcerative Colitis); a control group consisting of 15 irritable bowel

disease (IBS) patients; a control group consisting of 7 patients with

intestinal inflammation of non-IBD type (3 infectious colitis and

4 diverticulitis). We collected two fecal samples for each subject:

calprotectin was analyzed by ELISA, HMGB1 by the Western blot

technique.

Results:

Both calprotectin and HMGB1were significantly increased

in IBD compared to IBS patients. In non-IBD patients, calprotectin

was statistically more elevated than in IBS controls. Calprotectin

more effectively than HMGB1 correlated with endoscopic indices of

Crohn’s Disease with significant discrimination between mild IBD vs

IBS (p <0.01), and mild vs moderate IBD (p<0.05).

In Ulcerative Colitis, HMGB1 discriminated mild disease from IBS

controls (p <0.01), and moderate vs severe disease activity (p <0.01).

Both markers showed satisfactory sensitivity and specificity by the

ROC curves: calprotectin showed sensitivity of 85% and specificity

of 86.7% in Crohn’s disease, while in Ulcerative Colitis sensitivity

was 68% and specificity 87.6%; on the other hand, HMGB1 had

75% sensitivity and 73.3% specificity in Crohn’s disease, and 80%

sensitivity and 73% specificity in Ulcerative Colitis. In IBD calprotectin

had 75.5% sensitivity and 86.7% specificity, while HMGB1 showed

77.7% sensitivity and 73.4% specificity.

In non-IBD patients, calprotectin showed high sensitivity and

specificity (85.7% and 93.7% respectively), while HMGB1 had 57.14%

sensitivity and 73.3% specificity.

Conclusions:

HMGB1 is as useful as fecal calprotectin in assessing

intestinal inflammation in IBD with a significant correlation

with disease severity. HMGB1 performs better in UC while fecal

calprotectin in CD.

OC.02.6

IDENTIFICATION OF A CUT-OFF FOR PERSISTENT ANTI-

INFLIXIMAB ANTIBODIES AS A PREDICTOR OF RESPONSE TO

INFLIXIMAB MONOTHERAPY

Del Nero L.*

2

, Bodini G.

2

, Giannini E.G.

2

, Savarino V.

2

, De Maria C.

2

,

Baldissarro I.

2

, Savarino E.

1

1

Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and

Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua,, Padua, Italy,

2

Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of

Genoa, Genoa, Italy, Genoa, Italy

Background and aim:

The clinical and predictive role of anti-

Infliximab antibodies (AIA) presence and concentration are still

debated, both in Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC)

patients. However, there is increasing evidence of their usefulness

in order to improve the management of patients on biological

treatment who experience a loss of response (LOR). AIA can be

subdivided into 2 types, persistent and transient, on the basis of

their occurrence on multiple samples and capability of interfering

with infliximab trough levels (TL), and therefore persistent AIA seem

to play a major role on treatment outcome.

The aim of our retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical

relevance of persistent AIA in a single-center cohort of inflammatory

bowel disease (IBD) patients.

Material and methods:

We selected from our cohort of 56 IBD

patients treated with IFX mono-therapy who achieved clinical and

biochemical remission after induction (IFX schedule: 5 mg/kg at

week 0, week 2, and week 6), 18 patients (32.1%) who developed

persistent AIA during 48 weeks follow-up. Blood samples were

drawn at standardized time points (i.e., baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks,

and every 8 weeks) before IFX infusion. TL and AIA were measured

using an homogenous mobility shift assay (HMSA; Prometheus Lab,

San Diego, United States). Clinical disease activity was assessed

both at week 14 (i.e. after induction) and week 48 by the Harvey-

Bradshaw Index (HBI, remission defined by HBI<5) in CD patients

and by the Mayo score for UC patients (remission defined by Mayo

score <2). Also, protein-C reactive and erythrocyte sedimentation

rate (ESR) were measured.

Results:

Eighteen patients (11 CD and 7 UC, 10M/8F, median age 39.5

years, range 18-69) developed persistent AIA at a median of 2 weeks

(range 2-22) during 48 weeks follow-up. Among these patients, 12

(66.7%) experienced LOR during the follow-up period. Median AIA

were significantly higher in patients who showed LOR as compared

to patients who maintained remission (8.29 U/ml, range 0.62-30.52

U/ml, versus 1.41 U/ml, range 0.77-9.94 U/ml; P=0.04). ROC curve

identified a persistent AIA cut-off of 3.91 U/mL as the threshold

with the highest accuracy for the identification of relapsers

(AUROC=0.799, specificity=75.0%, sensitivity=83.3%).

Conclusions:

The early occurrence of elevated persistent AIA serum

concentrations during IFX mono-therapy treatment is associated

with high risk of LOR. Furthermore, the use of an AIA concentration

cut-off of 3.91 U/mL can be useful to accurately identify patients with

LOR, although these results need to be confirmed in larger series.

OC.02.7

ADALIMUMAB TROUGH LEVELS AT WEEK EIGHT AS PREDICTIVE

FACTOR OF LONG TERM CLINICAL REMISSION

Pellegatta G.*

2

, Moscatelli A.

2

, Savarino V.

2

, Savarino E.

1

, Bodini G.

2

,

Baldissarro I.

2

, Giannini E.G.

2

1

Surgery oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua,

Italy,

2

Internal Medicine, IRCCS San Martino Internal Medicine

Department, Genoa, Italy

Background and aim:

Adalimumab (ADA) has been approved for

the treatment of Crohn’s disease refractory to standard medications.