Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  31 / 172 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 31 / 172 Next Page
Page Background

e92

Abstracts of the 22

nd

National Congress of Digestive Diseases / Digestive and Liver Disease 48S2 (2016) e67–e231

Material and methods:

L. rhamnosus GG (ATCC 53103 strain)

was grown in MRS medium at 37°C and samples were collected in

exponential, early, middle and late stationary phases. Supernatants

were recovered by centrifugation, filtered and stored at -20°C. The

SMC culture was exposed for 24h to purified LPS (1μg/ml) of a

pathogen strain of E.coli (O111:B4) with and without supernatants.

Postbiotics effects were evaluated on morphofunctional alterations

and IL-6 production. Data are expressed as mean±SE (p<0.05

significant).

Results:

LPS induced persistent significant 20.5%±0.7 cell shortening

and 34.5%±2.2 decrease in acetylcholine-induced contraction of

human SMC. These morphofunctional alterations were paralleled to

a 365.65%±203.13 increase in IL-6 production. All these effects were

dose-dependently reduced in the presence of LGG-supernatants.

Supernatants of the middle exponential phase already partially

restored LPS-induced cell shortening by 57.34%±12.7 and IL6

increase by 145.8%±4.3 but had no effect on inhibition of contraction.

Maximal protective effects were instead obtained with supernatants

of the late stationary phase with LPS-induced cell shortening

restored by 84.1%±4.7, inhibition of contraction by 85.5%±6.4 and IL6

basal production by 92.7%±1.2.

Conclusions:

Byproducts produced by LGG are able to directly

protect human colonic smooth muscle from LPS-induced myogenic

damage. Novel insights are provided about the possibility that LGG-

derived products could reduce the risk of progression of a bacterial

gastroenteritis to post-infective motor disorders.

OC.06.4

THE OCCURRENCE OF POSTPRANDIAL SYMPTOMS IN IRRITABLE

BOWEL SYNDROME IS ASSOCIATED WITH A REDUCTION OF

POSTPRANDIAL SENSITIVITY THRESHOLDS

Di Stefano M., Bergonzi M.*, Valvo B., Saputo E., Craviotto V.,

Bresciani M., Pagani E., Miceli E., Corazza G.R.

1st Department of Internal Medicine, IRCCS S. Matteo Hospital

Foundation, Pavia, Italy

Background and aim:

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a chronic

condition with recurrent abdominal discomfort or pain associated

with an alteration of bowel habits (Longstreth, Gastroenterology

2006). The pathophysiology is partially known and alterations of

intestinal motility, visceral sensitivity and psycho-emotional aspects

have been described, causing alterations of the activity of the

brain-gut axis. Patients with IBS very frequently report abdominal

symptoms after the ingestion of a meal (Bohn, Am J Gastroenterol

2013), unrelated to functional dyspepsia. Therefore, the aim of this

study was the evaluation of visceral sensitivity in fasting condition

and after the administration of a meal in a subgroup of IBS patients

with postprandial exacerbation of symptoms in comparison with

healthy volunteers (HV).

Material and methods:

Thirty IBS patients (range 22-63), diagnosed

according to Rome III criteria and a group of 10 age- and sex-matched

HV were enrolled. In 15 IBS patients postprandial exacerbation of

symptom was present, while in the other 15 patients this problem

was not present. All subjects underwent the recto-sigmoid barostat

test (Di Stefano, Gut 2006). A double lumen polyvinyl tube with

an adherent, infinitely compliant plastic balloon was positioned at

the recto-sigmoid junction. Basal and postprandial recto-sigmoid

sensitivity thresholds were determined by sequential ramp

distensions with patients reporting their sensation on a 0-6 scale.

The modifications in balloon volume were monitored for 30 minutes

during fasting and 60 minutes postprandially (200 Kcal, 200 ml

liquid meal). The presence and severity of abdominal symptoms

were evaluated by VAL both during fasting and in the postprandial

period.

Results:

In comparison with HV, both mean fasting and postprandial

perception thresholds in IBS patients with or without postprandial

exacerbation of symptoms did not show any significant difference

(ANOVA=NS). As expected, the mean fasting discomfort threshold

was significantly lower in IBS patients than in HV (IBS with

postprandial symptoms 13.6±4.5 mmHg, IBS without postprandial

symptoms 14.6±4.2 mmHg; HV 20.2±2.3 mmHg, ANOVA p<0.001),

but between the two subgroups of IBS there were no differences.

On the contrary, the postprandial discomfort threshold was

significantly lower than fasting values only in the subgroup of IBS

with postprandial symptoms (IBS with postprandial symptoms

8.1±5.6 mmHg, IBS without postprandial symptoms 12.9±5.9

mmHg; HV 19.0±2.5 mmHg, ANOVA p<0.001). Finally, in IBS patients

with meal-related symptoms there was a significant increase of

abdominal discomfort and bloating during the test. None of the

patients suffered from dyspeptic symptoms.

Conclusions:

In IBS patients, a further reduction of the

discomfort threshold in the postprandial period may represent

a pathophysiological mechanism explaining the postprandial

occurrence of abdominal symptoms.

OC.06.5

ASSESSING THE RATE OF INCORRECT DIAGNOSIS OF CELIAC

DISEASE: DATA FROM A TERTIARY REFERRAL CENTER

Branchi F.*, Ferretti F., Roncoroni L., Bravo M., Bardella M.T.,

Conte D., Elli L.

Center for the Prevention and Diagnosis of Celiac Disease -

Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda -

Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy

Background and aim:

It is not uncommon in clinical practice to

deal with patients with a diagnosis of celiac disease (CD) who do

not actually fulfill the criteria, in spite of the availability of updated

international guidelines. The aim of this study was to identify

incorrect diagnostic approaches to patients with suspected CD

among referrals to our tertiary center.

Material and methods:

The clinical records of all consecutive

patients referred for the first clinical evaluation to our outpatient

clinic between January 1st 2014 and October 31st, 2015 were

evaluated. Patients with known or suspected CD were included. Data

on symptoms, serology, duodenal histology were collected, as well

as HLA class II profile when available. The current recommendations

of the Italian Ministry of Health were used as a reference standard

for the diagnosis of CD.

Results:

During the study period, 340 patients with a recent or

suspected diagnosis of CD were referred for a first evaluation to our

outpatient service. An incorrect diagnostic approach was identified

in 33 patients (9,7%, 28 females/5 males, median age 33 years, range

24-78) of whom 28 already possessed the medical indemnity for CD

despite not fulfilling criteria for CD. The most common diagnostic

mistake was the lack of HLA genetic testing and exclusion of other

causes in presence of seronegative villous atrophy (n=15), followed

by the absence of duodenal histology (n=6) and by tests performed

already on a gluten-free diet (GFD, n=6). Five patients had been given

a diagnosis of CD even in presence of negative serology and normal

duodenal histology and one patient was actually allergic to wheat.

The correct completion of the diagnostic work-up was programmed

with a median delay of 3 years (range 6 months-9 years), with

three patients receiving a final diagnosis of CD, two re-classified as

potential CD, 15 in whom CD was ruled out and 12 still waiting for a

definite diagnosis.

Conclusions:

Despite the presence of established diagnostic criteria

for CD, the rate of incorrect diagnosis was surprisingly high in our

series, mainly as a consequence of preventable mistakes in the

diagnostic process. These results may reflect a relevant burden on