Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  148 / 172 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 148 / 172 Next Page
Page Background

Abstracts of the 22

nd

National Congress of Digestive Diseases / Digestive and Liver Disease 48S2 (2016) e67–e231

e209

admission, reduces timing of procedures actuation and allows a

faster and appropriate therapy.

P.16.9

DOES URGENT COLONOSCOPY FOR LOWER GASTROINTESTINAL

BLEEDING NEED ORAL BOWEL PREPARATION?

Vitale G.*, Tremolaterra F., Iosca N., Sigillito A.R.

Ospedale “San Carlo”, Potenza, Italy

Background and aim:

Acute Lower GastroIntestinal Bleeding

(LGIB) represents a quarter of all bleeding events with a progressive

increased annual incidence. Colonoscopy is recommended in the

early evaluation of LGIB. It is suggested that bowel preparation

improves endoscopic visualization, diagnostic yield and safety of the

procedure. In clinical practice, it can be difficult to perform bowel

preparation in emergencies, maybe delaying times for colonoscopy.

Material and methods:

From July 2014 to October 2015 we analyzed

retrospectively data from patients (pts) affected by LGIB undergoing

urgent colonoscopy in our Endoscopic Unit. Pts characteristics,

endoscopic diagnostic/therapeutic results and clinical outcome

were submitted to statistical analysis.

Results:

Overall, 40 pts with LGIB (F/M ratio 1:1, mean age 70

years) were included in the analysis. As expected, 65% of pts were

on antiplatelet or anticoagulation therapy. All the pts performed

colonoscopy within 24 hours.

The 77,5% of colonoscopy (31/40 pts) had a early and satisfactory

diagnostic yield. The diagnostic ability was superior for the left

colon compared to the right colon lesions (20 vs 7 lesions). In the left

colon were found 24 bleeding lesions: 6 rectal ulcers, 4 diverticula,

4 ischemic colitis, 3 post-polypectomy bleeding, 2 other colitis, 2

polyps/neoplasia, 2 radiation proctitis, 1 hemorrhoids while only 7

bleeding sources were found in the right colon (2 diverticula, 2 post-

polypectomy bleeding, 3 small bowel bleeding). Where the bleeding

source was not identified (9/40 pts; 22,5%), complete colonoscopy

after bowel preparation showed 3 right colon angiodysplasias and 2

right diverticular bleeding self-limited.

Overall, 35,5% (11/31) of pts had active bleeding endoscopically

treated (clips or clips plus epinephrine). Two pts were referred to

surgical treatment (ischemic colitis), while the other pts received

medical treatment.

Conclusions:

In our experience, peristaltic water pump cleaning

use during urgent colonoscopy without bowel preparation, is

effective in the diagnosis and endoscopic treatment of acute LGIB.

The diagnostic ability of this procedure seems to be superior for the

left colon compared to right colon lesions. This approach enables to

suggest bowel preparation and subsequent colonoscopy just to pts

with suspected right colon bleeding.

P.16.10

DOUBLE BALLOON ENTEROSCOPY IN DETECTING SMALL BOWEL

NEUROENDOCRINE NEOPLASMS (SB-NENS)

Rossi R.E.*, Branchi F., Elli L., Conte D., Massironi S.

Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, Fondazione IRCCS

Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, and Department of

Pathophysiology and Organ Transplantation, Università degli Studi di

Milano, milano, Italy

Background and aim:

Small bowel neuroendocrine neoplasms

(SB-NENs) are usually difficult to diagnose, given their nonspecific

presentation and poor accessibility of the distal small bowel. The

diagnosis of small bowel tumors has been hugely improved with the

advent of small bowel endoscopy allowing a direct visualization of

the entire small bowel. Data describing the effectiveness of double-

balloon enteroscopy (DBE) in the detection of SB-NENs are scanty,

due to the low frequency of NENs and the still limited use of DBE in

clinical practice. Accordingly, present series was aimed at reporting

the experience at a single referral centre for NENs.

Material and methods:

All consecutive patients with a suspected

SB-NEN selected for diagnostic DBE were enrolled at our Institution.

Results:

Between January 2011 and September 2015, 45 patients

with suspected SB-NEN or affected with NEN from unknown primary

were referred to our Centre. SB-NENs were suspected on the basis of

clinical presentation, elevated neuroendocrine biomarkers and the

presence of histologically confirmed neuroendocrine metastases

(two patients), positive video capsule endoscopy (VCE) (four

patients) or positive nuclear imaging (one patient). After an extensive

work-up, six patients (4 M, 2 F, median age 50 years) underwent DBE

(three anterograde, two retrograde, one both; median time: 60 min;

median insertion 200 cm). DBE was positive in two patients with

evidence of an ileal lesion of 1 and 2 cm in diameter, respectively

(histologically G1 NEN), these findings being superimposable to

those of VCE. Both patients underwent uneventful surgical resection

of the SB-NEN. Of the four other patients with negative DBE, two

had metastatic NENs of unknown primary, one had primary jejunal

NEN revealed by Gallium68-PET and then surgically removed and

the last patient resulted a true negative as NEN was not confirmed at

long-term follow-up. Overall, in absence of falsely positive results,

DBE showed a sensitivity of 33%. No complications were observed

during the procedure.

Conclusions:

In line with data from literature, present series

showed that DBE is a safe procedure in the diagnosis of SB-NENs.

Further studies are needed to better clarify the diagnostic role of

DBE in the neuroendocrine tumor setting and its relationship with

other techniques, i.e. VCE and nuclear imaging.

P.16.11

SIMULTANEOUS ONE-PIECE ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL

DISSECTION FOR TWO POORLY DIFFERENTIATED EARLY GASTRIC

CANCER IN ELDERLY PATIENT

Alvisi C.*, Rovedatti L., Viganò J., Broglia F., Bardone M., Strada E.,

Pozzi L., Centenara L., Antonietti M., Natoli S., Lenti M., Dionigi P.,

Corazza G.R.

Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy

Background and aim:

Incidence of early gastric cancer (EGC)

is higher in Eastern than in Western countries and endoscopic

submucosal dissection (ESD) is actually a feasible treatment since

extended indications have been developed.

EGC presents with simultaneous multiple lesions in 5.8% to 15%

cases and only few Eastern papers describe their simultaneous

treatment with ESD.

Material and methods:

An 81 year-old woman was referred to

our unit from another hospital to treat two adjacent but separated

mucosal lesions of the antrum greater curvature. According to

the Paris Classification lesions were 0-IIa and 0-IIc, about 18mm

and 6 mm wide respectively and histological examination of

biopsy specimens showed high grade dysplasia and intramucosal

adenocarcinoma in the large one and high grade dysplasia in the

small one. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) described mucosal and only

first level submucosal invasion. CT scan was negative. We performed

ESD under general anesthesia using Olympus Hook-Knife (Olympus

Medical System, Tokyo, Japan).

Results:

As our video material shows, both adjacent lesions were

simultaneously completely removed in one piece. No bleeding or

other complications occurred. Every visible vessel was coagulated

with hemostatic forceps (Coagrasper Olympus Medical System,

Tokyo, Japan) and hemoclips were used for bleeding prophylaxis.

Histological examination revealed single specimen of 4.2 x 3.8

cm with 2 lesions: a 0.6cm and a 2cm lesions. Both were poorly