Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  152 / 172 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 152 / 172 Next Page
Page Background

Abstracts of the 22

nd

National Congress of Digestive Diseases / Digestive and Liver Disease 48S2 (2016) e67–e231

e213

P.17.5

FIBRIN SEALANT (EVICEL®): ENDOSCOPIC INTERVENTIONAL

MANAGEMENT OF BLEEDING GASTROINTESTINAL LESIONS:

PROSPECTIVE, SINGLE-ARM, PILOT STUDY

Staiano T.*

3

, Martinotti M.

1

, Rispo A.

2

, Buffoli F.

4

1

S.C. Chirurgia Generale A.O. Istituti Ospitalieri di Cremona, Cremona,

Italy,

2

DAI Gastroenterologia, Endocrinologia, Chirurgia A.O.U. Federico

II, Napoli, Italy,

3

S.C. Endoscopia Diagnostica e Chirurgia Endoscopica

Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy,

4

S.C.

Endoscopia Digestiva e Gastroenterologia A.O. Istituti Ospitalieri di

Cremona, Cremona, Italy

Background and aim:

The mortality and morbidity rates for

gastrintestinal bleeding lesions are higher in patients with spurting

bleeding, oozing, or a non bleeding visible vessel on endoscopy. The

prognosis of patients presenting with major peptic ulcer bleeding

is improved by endoscopic injection therapy. A high success rate of

70 – 100% has been reported using various agents, such as ethanol,

polidocanol, cyanoacrylates. Evicel

®

is a fibrin sealant consisting of

two components, human clottable fibrinogen and human thrombin.

It is indicated as supportive treatment in patients undergoing

surgery when control of bleeding by standard surgical techniques is

ineffective. It is a new formulation of the previously available fibrin

sealant. Evicel is easy to use and don’t contain synthetic or bovine

aprotinin, reducing potential for hypersensitivity reactions. The aim

of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients with

GI bleeding lesions treated with Evicel.

Material and methods:

Between September 2014 and August 2015,

a total of 10 patients with major hemorrhagic lesions (Non Variceal

Upper and Lower GastroIntestinal Bleeding Lesion (NV-ULGIBL))

with active bleeding or a nonbleeding visible vessel were enrolled.

The pts were well matched for age, sex, initial hemoglobin values,

ulcer size and location, and bleeding stigmata.

7 of 10 patients were female (median age 82.9 y). Patients

who underwent Evicel injection the fibrin sealant was injected

submucosally at the bleeding site. We opted for the sequential

single lumen injection technique to facilitate injection and diffusion

of the diluted fibrin into the submucosa followed by the thrombin

activator to maximize hemostasis within the target area and avoid

early superficial clot formation. Patients, lesions characteristics and

outcomes are summarized in Table 1 (Fig 1).

Results:

Initial hemostasis was achieved in all cases (100%).

Rebleeding occurs in one case (duodenal ulcer with active arterial

bleeding) and was treated with selective transarterial embolization.

No early or late rebleeding occurred during the follow-up. No

complications or instrument lesions related to Evicel injection were

recorded.

Conclusions:

In our series, fibrin sealant injection was found to be a

potentially safe and effective endoscopic haemostatic treatment

modalities in controlling bleeding from NV – UL GIBL with major

hemorragic stigmata. Due to the the small number of patients and

the absence of randomisation, in our study, no definitive conclusions

could be drawn concerning the use of the Evicel in the treatment of

severe NV ULGIBL bleeding.

P.17.6

QUALITY OF LIFE AFTER GASTRIC BANDING AND GASTRIC BY-

PASS FOR MORBID OBESITY: A PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON

Marchesi F.

1

, Forlini C.*

1

, De Sario G.

1

, Tartamella F.

1

, De Lorenzis G.

3

,

Generali I.

4

, Ricco’ M.

2

, Dall’Aglio E.

5

, De Panfilis C.

4

1

Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Parma, Parma, Italy,

2

Azienda

Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari della Provincia Autonoma di Trento,

Trento, Italy,

3

Casa di Cura Città di Parma, Parma, Italy,

4

Dipartimento

di Neuroscienze, Università di Parma, Parma, Italy,

5

Unità Operativa

di Diabetologia e Malattie Dismetaboliche, Dipartimento di Medicina

Interna e Scienze biomediche, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di

Parma, Parma, Italy

Background and aim:

Among bariatric surgery evaluation criteria,

improvement in quality of life (QoL) surely represents the most

important. However, the lack of reliable evaluation models has

significantly limited the research in this field. The aim of this study

is to prospectively compare QoL after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

(RYGB) and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB).

Material and methods:

35 patients submitted to RYGB at “Parma

Hospital” and 35 patients submitted to LAGB at the “Clinica Città

di Parma” were enrolled in the study. Patients were prospectively

submitted to one preoperative and 4 postoperative (1, 3, 6 and 12

months) clinical evaluations including two psychodiagnostic tests:

the Short Form 36 (SF-36) testing the quality of life and the Bariatric

Surgery Satisfaction Questionnaire (BSSQ) assessing the satisfaction

for the intervention. At the same times, comorbidity (i.e glucidic

tolerance, degenerative joint disease etc.) and biometric changes (i.e

weight, height and BMI), have been evaluated. The two groups have

been compared relatively to change in BMI and comorbidities and

the outcome of the two questionnaires.

Results:

Both interventions produced a significant amelioration of

biometric data, significantly higher for RYGB (p=0.05). While at early

controls no significant difference in SF-36 was detected among the

Table 1

(abstract P.17.5)

Characteristics of patients and outcome

Patient

Hemorragic

Successful

Additional

(case)

Sex

Age

Site of bleeding

Stigmata

Hemostasis

Treatments

Rebleeding

Outcome

1

F

89

J-jejunal anastomosis

Ia

Yes

No

No

Favorable

2

F

87

Duodenal ulcer

Ib

Yes

No

No

Favorable

3

F

72

Duodenal ulcer

Ib

Yes

No

No

Favorable

4

M

87

Gastric ulcer (fundus)

Iia

Yes

No

No

Favorable

5

F

78

Duodenal ulcer

Ia

Yes

Yes: clip

Yes: Tae

Favorable

6

F

85

Rectal ulcer

Spurting vessel

Yes

No

No

Favorable

7

F

82

Gastric ulcer (antrum)

Iia

Yes

No

No

Favorable

8

M

37

Gastric ulcer (body)

Ia

Yes

No

No

Favorable

9

M

68

Rectal cancer

Oozing bleeding cancer floor area

Yes

No

No

Favorable

10

F

66

Colo–anal anastomosis

Spurting vessel

Yes

No

No

Favorable