Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  89 / 172 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 89 / 172 Next Page
Page Background

e150

Abstracts of the 22

nd

National Congress of Digestive Diseases / Digestive and Liver Disease 48S2 (2016) e67–e231

typing. We asked the patient to restart gluten-free diet. EGDS

was performed in 2015 (after 18 month) and showed a normal

duodenum mucosa. Histological exam showed no villous atrophy,

not inflammatory infiltrate. CD diagnosis was confirmed and patient

resolved gastrointestinal manifestation and anemia.

Conclusions:

Villous atrophy can be seen in patients with CVID.

Infectious agents may be responsible, whereas in others, CD may be

the cause. Our case report demonstrates that celiac antibodies gave

conflicting results and were of no help in CVID diagnosis. HLA-DQ

typing is important for exclusion of CD. Histologic response to a GFD

allowed a diagnosis of CD and remains the only diagnostic criteria

for CD.

P.05.7

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF STUDIES

COMPARING METAL OR PLASTIC STENTS FOR PREOPERATIVE

BILIARY DRAINAGE IN RESECTABLE PANCREATIC CANCER

Belfiori G.*

4

, Crippa S.

1

, Cirocchi R.

2

, Arcidiacono P.G.

3

, Partelli S.

1

,

Salandini M.C.

1

, Muffatti F.

1

, Falconi M.

1

1

Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Vita e Salute University, San Raffaele

Hospital, Milan, Italy,

2

Department of General and Oncologic Surgery,

University of Perugia, St. Maria Hospital, TERNI, Italy,

3

GI UNIT Vita e

Salute University, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy,

4

Department of

Surgery, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona,

Italy

Background and aim:

In resectable pancreatic cancer, preoperative

biliary drainage (PBD) increases complications compared with

early surgery without PBD. However PBD may be necessary in

patients with marked hyperbilirubinemia or in patients undergoing

neoadjuvant therapy. Metal stents seem to be more effective than

plastic stents in these settings.

Material and methods:

Systematic review and meta-analysis of

studies comparing metal versus plastic stents in patients undergoing

endoscopic PBD for resectable pancreatic cancer. Primary outcome

was the rate of endoscopic reintervention (ER), meaning stent

failure of preoperative biliary drainage before surgery. Secondary

outcomes were rate of overall complications related to preoperative

biliary drainage, before and after surgery such as anastomotic

leakage, intra-abdominal abscesses, delayed gastric emptying,

wound infection, portal vein thrombosis, pancreatic fistulas, biliary

anastomotic leak and mortality.

Results:

One Cohort prospective Trial and four retrospective cohort

trials were identified including 704 patients comparing metal vs

plastic stents. Of these, 202 patients (29.5%) were treated with metal

stents and 502 patients (70.5%) with plastic stents. The majority

of patients had a pancreatic adenocarcinoma 610 (86.4%). The

methodological quality assessment for each of the included studies

was considered as “fair”. The rate of ER was significantly lower

in the metal stent group than in the plastic group (3.4% vs 14.8%,

p = 0.0009). In addition, rate of postoperative pancreatic fistulas

resulted significantly lower in the metal stent group 5.1% vs 11.8%

(p=0.04). No significant difference was found in the other secondary

outcomes.

Conclusions:

Even though early surgery remains the standard

preference in most patients suffering from jaundice with a resectable

pancreatic tumour, metal stents should be preferred for PBD when

surgery must be delayed.

P.05.8

RECURRENT LIFE-THREATENING GASTROINTESTINAL BLEEDING

DUE TO MECKEL’S DIVERTICULUM

Criscuoli V.*

1

, Mancuso A.

1

, Fazio V.

2

, Maringhini A.

1

1

Medicine Department - Di Cristina - Benfratelli, Piazza Leotta 4

ARNAS Civico, Palermo, Italy,

2

Surgery Department, Di Cristina

Benfratelli ARNAS CIVICO, Palermo, Italy

Background and aim:

This is a case of a 34 year old man presented

with a further episode of gastrointestinal bleeding (GB) motivating

admission in the department of Medicine.

Material and methods:

His previous history began two years before,

with three episodes of GB, presenting as melena, with haemorrhagic

shock in one occasion, and plenty transfusions during the episodes.

Five upper endoscopic and 6 coloscopic exams, both urgent and

elective, had been performed, only finding an angiodyplasia of the

cecum, that was treated with argon plasma coagulation. Moreover,

no other sources were found at two small bowel capsule studies and

at two enteroscopic exams. After discharge lanreotide was started.

Eleven months later, a new episode on GB occurred. After admission,

melena persisted despite optimal medical treatment. Further urgent

both upper and lower endoscopy, angioCT and angiographic exams,

did not find bleeding sources. Due to the development of

haemorrhagic shock, a surgical emergency procedure was performed

during which Meckel’s diverticulum (MD) with bleeding ulcers was

found and surgically removed at about 60 cm from ileo-cecal valve

(Fig 1).

Results:

Histological examination confirmed MD with ulcerated

ectopic gastric mucosa. The patient was dismissed after few days

and no further episodes of GB occurred during follow up.

Conclusions:

MD is the vestigial remnant of the omphalomesenteric

duct and represents the most common congenital anomaly of the

gastrointestinal tract. MD known complications are intestinal

obstruction, intussusceptions, ulceration, hemorrhage, vesico-

diverticular fistulae and tumors. However, whether GB represents

the most common complications of MD in children, it is a rare

complication in adults. Both endoscopic, radiological exams and

scintigraphy are useful but not always address the diagnosis. Our

report suggests that a diagnosis of MD should be considered in

young adults with recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding of otherwise

unknown cause.

P.05.9

GASTROINTESTINAL NEUROENDOCRINE TUMORS OF UNKNOWN

PRIMARY SITE: REPORT FROM A SERIES AT A SINGLE INSTITUTE

Fanetti I.*, Cavalcoli F., Zilli A., Conte D., Massironi S.

Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Unità di

Gastroenterologia ed Endoscopia, Milano, Italy