Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  134 / 172 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 134 / 172 Next Page
Page Background

Abstracts of the 22

nd

National Congress of Digestive Diseases / Digestive and Liver Disease 48S2 (2016) e67–e231

e195

Table 2

Left-sided

Extensive/

Proctitis Proctosigmoiditis

colitis

Pancolitis

Disease activity

Remission 7 (29%)

21 (47%)

13 (65%)

20 (43%)

Mild

12 (50%)

22 (49%)

5 (25%)

17 (37%)

Moderate 4 (16%)

1 (2%)

1 (5%)

7 (15%)

Severe

1 (5%)

1 (2%)

1 (5%)

2 (5%)

Therapy

Oral

7 (30%)

24 (53%)

17 (85%)

35 (76%)

Topical

3 (12%)

3 (7%)

0

0

Combined 12 (50%)

16 (35%)

2 (10%)

10 (22%)

Other*

3 (12%)

15 (33%)

1 (5%)

21 (46%)

No therapy 2 (8%)

2 (8%)

1 (5%)

1(2%)

* Other therapies: Steroids, Immunosoppressors or anti-TNF antibodies

Conclusions:

Topical therapy is underused in our coohort of patients,

especially in patients with pancolitis. A dedicated IBD outpatients

unit may help to ameliorate the rate of adherence to medical topical

treatment. Further studies are needed to evaluate factors affecting

adherence and possibile strategies to improve topical therapy use.

P.14.3

CORRELATION BETWEEN CLINICAL RESPONSE AND ANEMIA

RESOLUTION IN PATIENTS WITH INFLAMMATORY BOWEL

DISEASES TREATED WITH ANTI-TNF INHIBITORS

Magarotto A.*

1

, Shepherd T.

2

, Balendran P.

3

, Goodhand J.

3

, Cronin E.

4

,

Graveson K.

2

, Wood E.

3

, Marelli L.

3

, Hamilton M.

2

, Conte D.

1

,

Caprioli F.

1

, Murray C.

2

1

IRCCS Ospedale Cà Granda Policlinico di Milano, Milan, Italy,

2

Gastroenterology Department, Royal Free Hospital, London, United

Kingdom,

3

Gastroenterology Department, Homerton Hospital, London,

United Kingdom,

4

United Kingdom

Background and aim:

Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) represents

a frequent and undertreated finding in IBD patients. Oral iron

supplementation is considered as effective as intravenous iron for

treating IBD-associated IDA, even if active intestinal inflammation

may limit iron enteral absorption. However, response to oral iron

supplementation in IBD with respect to inflammatory status is

still largely unknown. Present retrospective study was aimed

at determining whether the effectiveness of antiTNF therapy is

associated with response to iron supplementation in IBD-related

IDA.

Material andmethods:

Patient series included 174 IBD patients with

IBD-related IDA, examined at the enrollement and after long term

antiTNF regimen given at a single UK center (Royal Free Hospital,

London). Primary response was defined as the combination at least

two of the following: absence of symptoms, steroid withdrawal, and

C reactive protein normalization. Primary non-response was defined

as one or none of the above.

Results:

In the present cohort, 155/174 patients (89%) had Crohn’s

disease and 85/174 (49%) were anaemic at anti-TNF initiation, with a

mean [SEM] haemoglobin level of 10.89[0.144] g/dl. At baseline, 51/85

(60%) had iron deficiency anaemia, 15/85 (18%) anaemia of chronic

disease, 4/85 (5%) vitamin B12/folate deficiency and 15/85 (17%)

undefined. Overall, 35 out of the 51 IDA patients (69%) were treated

with oral iron. In this set of patients with iron supplementation (28

with CD and 7 with UC), there was no difference in baseline mean

haemoglobin levels in responders as compared with nonresponders

to antiTNF treatment (11.04[0.158] vs 10.59[0.282]), p=0.14. Notably,

responders had a slightly greater increase in haemoglobin levels at

14 weeks (11.04 to 12.05 vs. 10.59 to 11.16 in non-responders) even

if no significant difference in mean change in haemoglobin was

observed (responders +1.01[0.179]; non-responders +0.60[0.299]),

p=0.21.

Conclusions:

Our data suggest that oral iron supplementation is

effective in increasing haemoglobin levels in IBD patients, regardless

to their response to anti-TNF therapy which does not impair oral

iron absorption and could be used at the same time. These results

suggest that oral iron should be considered in all IBD patients with

active inflammation.

P.14.4

ESCHERICHIA COLI NISSLE 1917 IN ULCERATIVE COLITIS

TREATMENT: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

Principi M., Losurdo G.*, Iannone A., Contaldo A., Ierardi E., Di Leo A.

UO Gastroenterologia universitaria, Policlinico di Bari, Bari, Italy

Background and aim:

Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 (EcN) has been

advised as a therapeutic tool for Ulcerative Colitis (UC) treatment.

However, to date, no meta-analysis has been performed on the topic.

Material and methods:

We performed a literature search on

PubMed, MEDLINE, Science Direct and EMBASE. We evaluated

success rates for induction of remission, relapse rates and side

effects, expressed as Intention-To-Treat. Odd ratios (OR), pooled

OR and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated, based on the

Mantel-Haenszel method. Heterogeneity was assessed by using

the

c

2 and I2 statistics and, if present, a random-effects model was

adopted.

Results:

We selected six eligible trials, with 719 patients, 390

assigned to the study group and 329 to the control group. EcN

induced remission in 61.6% of cases, while in the control group

(mesalazine) the remission was achieved in 69.5% of cases, with a

mean difference of 7.9%. The pooled OR was 0.92 (95% CI 0.15-9.66,

p=0.93). A single study showed a better performance of EcN than

placebo. A relapse of the disease occurred in 36.8% in EcN group and

in 36.1% in control group (mesalazine), with a mean difference of

0.8%, OR=1.07, with a 95% CI of 0.70-1.64 (p=0.74). Side effects were

comparable (OR=1.44, 95% CI 0.80-2.59, p=0.22).

Conclusions:

EcN is equivalent to mesalazine in preventing disease

relapse, thus confirming current guidelines recommendations.

EcN seems to be as effective as controls in inducing the remission;

therefore, its use cannot be recommended as in one study the

comparison was performed against placebo despite further studies

may be helpful for this topic.

P.14.5

METASTATIC CUTANEOUS CROHN’S DISEASE OF THE FACE

TREATED WITH INFLIXIMAB: CASE REPORT AND FOLLOW UP

Peruzzi E.*

1

, Piersimoni F.

1

, Carella A.

1

, Giacchetti A.

1

, Ricotti G.

1

,

Giangiacomi M.

2

1

INRCA, Ancona, Italy,

2

Azienda OSP Riuniti, ANCONA, Italy

Background and aim:

MCD is a rare extraintestinal manifestation of

active CD. Only a few cases of facial involvement have been reported.

Diagnosis can be difficult and treatmenet is largely anedoctal.

Sometime improvement has been reported with drugs used for CD.

We describe a patient with intestinal CD disease in remission but

active MCD refractory to usually drugs used for CD, that improved

after infliximab (IFX).

Material and methods:

In 2008 a 58-y-old female was refferred to

Dermatology Department for evaluation of painful erithematous

purple papulas, nodules and plaques on her face, she referred in

2006 a ileocecal resection for stenosing and fistulizing CD and since

then in clinical and endoscopi remission. Empiric treatment with

topical and sistemic antibiotics and steroids and azathioprine was

ineffective, cutaneous biopsywas performed; histologic examination